It's no surprise the media's clammed up on Iraq just as the reasons for hope grow steadily stronger. For the last three years, most major media outlets have invested their personal credibility in the all's-doomed angle. Allowing that this call may have been premature is embarrassing. But more interesting is the implicit conceit that there's no such thing as good news, as World News Tonight anchor Charlie Gibson recently opined:
News about the
war does not dominate the public’s consciousness nearly as much as it did last winter. Currently, just 16% of Americans name the Iraq war as the news story that first comes to mind when asked what has been in the news lately. In December and January, a period when Iraq U.S.policy toward Iraqand President Bush’s troop surge drew extensive news coverage, as many as half or more named the war as the first story that came to mind. Iraq
Despite decreased public interest in the war [this doesn't logically follow the last 'graf -- FP], a growing number of Americans fault news organizations for providing too little, rather than too much, coverage of the war. In particular, the public believes that the challenges and experiences ofFully 63% say that “the challenges faced by some
U.S.soldiers – both while serving in Iraqand after returning to the – are receiving too little news coverage. United States U.S.soldiers returning from ” have received too little news coverage; about the same number (61%) say that reports about soldiers’ personal experiences have been undercovered. Iraq
One item from Baghdad today. The news is … that there is no news. The police told us that, to their knowledge, there were no major acts of violence. Attacks are down in Baghdad and today no bombings or roadside explosions were reported.Apparently, Americans disagree -- this is news.